FOIPP Act Policy and Procedures Manual
Section
12 - Cabinet and Local Public Body Confidences
Last updated: July 13, 2007
|
OVERVIEW
Section 12 contains two
exceptions to the general right of access established by
section 4
(Information rights) of the Act. The first exception is a
mandatory exception relating to
public bodies and is contained in subsection 12(1). The second exception is
a discretionary exception relating to local public bodies and is contained in
subsection 12(3).
SECTION REFERENCE
Section 12 of the
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
12 (1) The
head
of a
public body
must refuse to disclose to an
applicant
information that would
reveal the
substance of deliberations of
the Executive Council or any
of its committees, including any
advice,
recommendations,
policy considerations
or draft legislation or
regulations
submitted or prepared for
submission to the Executive Council or any of its committees.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to
(a) information in a
record that has been in existence for
15 or more years,
(b) information in a record of a decision made by the Executive Council or any of its committees on an
appeal under an Act, or
(c) information in a record the
purpose of which is to present
background explanations or analysis to the
Executive Council or any of its committees for its consideration in
making a decision if
(i) the decision has been made public,
(ii) the
decision has been implemented, or
(iii)
5 or more years have passed since the decision was
made or considered.
(3) The head of a
local public body
may refuse to disclose to an
applicant information that would reveal
(a) a draft
of a resolution,
bylaw or
other legal instrument by which the local
public body acts or a draft of a
private Bill, or
(b) the substance of deliberations of a
meeting of its elected officials or of its governing body or a
committee
of its governing body,
if an Act or a regulation under this Act
authorizes the holding of that meeting in the absence of the public.
(4) Subsection (3) does not apply if
(a) the draft of the resolution, bylaw,
other legal instrument or private Bill or the subject matter of the
deliberations
has been considered in a meeting open to
the public, or
(b) the
information referred to in that subsection is in a
record that has been in existence for
15 or more
years.
(5) The Lieutenant Governor in Council by regulation may designate a
committee for the purposes of this section.
(6) A committee may be designated under subsection (5) only if
(a) the Lieutenant Governor in Council considers that
(i) the deliberations of the committee relate to
the deliberations of the Executive Council, and
(ii) the committee exercises functions of the
Executive Council, and
(b) at least 1/3 of the members of the committee are members of the
Executive Council.

CABINET CONFIDENCES -
12(1) and 12(2)
SUMMARY
Subsection 12(1) is intended to prevent the harm to
government that is presumed to occur if the substance of deliberations is
revealed before or too soon after the issues were considered or revealed prior
to being ready for public review. Premature disclosure of Cabinet deliberations
inhibits the ability of Cabinet members to debate issues openly and freely,
thereby reducing the effectiveness of Cabinet’s decision making role.
Subsection 12(1) provides a mandatory exception to the general right of access established by section 4 of the Act. Subsection 12(1) applies to all records in the custody or under the control of public bodies as defined in the Act. The exception does not apply to records that have been in existence for 15 or more years, or to records of a decision made by Cabinet or one of its committees on an appeal under an Act.
Subsection 12(1) also does not apply where the information in question was prepared to provide background explanations or analysis to Cabinet, or one of its committees, for its consideration in making a decision, if the decision has been made public or implemented, or 5 or more years have passed since the decision was made or considered.
Section 12 and the Existing Parliamentary Convention
A number of parliamentary conventions govern British Columbia's Cabinet. For example, the convention of collective ministerial responsibility means the Legislature and the public can hold the entire government accountable for its actions. In practice, all members of Cabinet are expected to publicly support government decisions, actions and policies. Further, Cabinet discussions and deliberations prior to a final decision have traditionally been kept confidential to permit full and frank discussions within Cabinet and to avoid breaking the position of unity once a decision has been made.
Subsection 12(1), the Cabinet confidences exception, should be interpreted in a manner consistent with preservation of the existing parliamentary convention.

CABINET CONFIDENCES -
12(1) and 12(2)
POLICY
-
Public bodies must consult with the Office of the
Deputy Minister to the Premier in regards to information that must be excepted
from disclosure under subsection 12(1). The public body must obtain sign off
from the Office of the Deputy Minister to the Premier before the head of the
public body makes the final determination on the response to the request.

CABINET CONFIDENCES -
12(1) and 12(2)
PROCEDURE
-
Determine the age of the record. See
Calculation of time. If the record has been in existence for 15 or more
years, this exception does not apply, and the record must be released unless
another exception applies.
-
Preliminary Examination
-
Notify the
Director/Manager of Information and Privacy
(DMIP),
Office of the Deputy Minister to the Premier (the Director of Information and
Privacy, Ministry of Finance that a request has been received for which the
release of records may reveal Cabinet confidences pursuant to section 12(1).
Note: All decisions related to applying section 12 to any record must be
made in consultation with the Office of the Deputy Minister to the Premier.
-
Line by Line Review
Identify information that may be severed under other exceptions.
-
Undertake formal consultation with the Office of
the Deputy Minister to the Premier.
-
As a consequence of the formal consultations, it is
normal to extend the time limit for responding by 30
days in
accordance with section 10.
-
Severance
The public body should forward any records that may be related to
section 12(1)
to the DMIP responsible for the Office of the Deputy Minister to the Premier for
review and confirmation of section 12 information. The Office of the Deputy
Minister to the Premier will highlight, in pink/red, those sections of the
records relevant to section 12 and return the highlighted version to the public
body for formal sign-off by the head.

CABINET CONFIDENCES -
12(1) and 12(2)
INTERPRETATION
Interpretation
Note 1
(Section 12(1)):
The following are things to consider when
determining if subsection 12(1) might apply:
- Is the record/information in the Cabinet stream; e.g., submitted or
prepared for submission to Cabinet or any of its committees? Consult
with the Office of the Deputy Minister to the Premier.
- Is the information one of the types listed in subsection 12(1) as
information presumed to reveal the substance of deliberations, such as:
-
advice - a suggested course of
action?
-
a recommendation - favoured or
preferred course of action?
-
a policy consideration - issues
to be considered before a decision can be reached? or
-
draft legislation or regulations?
- If the information is one of the types of information listed in #2,
would disclosure reveal the substance of deliberations of Cabinet or any
of its committees; i.e., would disclosure reveal details of the
issues under discussion? Advice or recommendations must reveal the
details of issues under discussion by Cabinet to
be withheld under subsection 12(1).
- If there is any other information that would reveal details of the
issues under discussion, then it must be severed under subsection 12(1).
The list in #2 is not exhaustive. For example, policy options,
discussion of alternate courses of action, discussion of government
policy may reveal the substance of deliberations.
Subsection
12(1) does not apply to paragraphs 12(2)(a)-(c).
Must refuse to disclose
Information
The information that is excepted from disclosure may be a short reference in a record.
Example
- An applicant requests a copy of a letter from a deputy minister to the ministry's assistant deputy ministers. The letter contains routine matters, except for a single sentence that says Treasury Board (a Cabinet committee) will be considering whether a planned program must be cancelled. The information contained in that one sentence must be severed because it would reveal the substance of deliberations of a Cabinet committee. The applicant would receive the remainder of the record (unless other exceptions apply).
"That would reveal"
"Reveal"
Example
of information revealed
explicitly
- A note from
the Secretary to the
Executive Council to a
minister, copy to a deputy
minister, that informs the
minister of the discussions
that Cabinet had on a
particular issue. This
information, in itself,
reveals the substance of
Cabinet deliberations
Example
of information revealed implicitly
- A letter from the Secretary to a Cabinet committee to a well-known expert on labour law, asking him if he would be available to attend a sitting of a Cabinet committee, on a particular date at a given time, and answer questions on a pressing issue. This information, by itself, does not reveal the substance of Cabinet deliberations. However, combined with media reports of Cabinet needing to deal with a particular labour issue, the release of this information would implicitly reveal the substance of Cabinet deliberations - it is reasonable to assume that someone could infer that Cabinet will consider the issue at a particular time.
"Substance"
"Deliberation"
The following are a few of the types of records that would reveal the substance of deliberations of Cabinet or a Cabinet committee:
Example
- An agenda, minute or other record that documents the matters addressed by Cabinet (e.g., a list of issues tabled at Cabinet that reflects the priorities of Cabinet).
-
A letter from Cabinet or a Cabinet committee that relates to the discussion or consideration of an issue or problem, or that reflects a decision made but not made public (e.g., a letter from Treasury Board to a ministry executive stating a decision that affects the ministry's budget but which has not been announced). Note: this is an instance where a record not placed before Cabinet or one of its committees would reveal the substance of deliberations.
-
A briefing note placed before Cabinet or one of its committees.
-
A memo from a deputy minister to the assistant deputy ministers in a ministry that informs them when Cabinet will consider an issue.
-
A briefing note from a deputy minister to a minister concerning a matter that will be/is being considered by Cabinet.
-
A draft or final Cabinet submission.
Executive Council or any of its committees
The "Executive Council" is commonly known as the Cabinet.
This phrase refers to a group of ministers, acting collectively. The scope of
subsection 12(1) does not extend to the individual minister level, unless the individual minister is acting as a Cabinet committee.
A committee of the Executive Council, also known as a Cabinet committee, includes one or more Cabinet ministers. The committee exercises some or all of the powers of Cabinet as a whole, or develops and provides recommendations to Cabinet. Also included in the definition is an entity or individual to which the Executive Council or any of its committees has delegated decision-making authority on their behalf.
Included in the definition of Executive Council committees are all Cabinet Caucus Committees.
The existing Cabinet committees include:
-
all Cabinet Caucus Committees;
-
Cabinet/Caucus Committee on Legislation;
-
Treasury Board;
-
Agenda Development
Committee;
-
Legislative Review
Committee;
-
Environment and
Land Use Committee;
-
Cabinet's Committee
for Climate Action;
-
Cabinet Committee
on New Relationship Coordination;
-
Government Caucus
Committee on Natural Resources and Economy;
-
Government Caucus
Committee on Social Development
Including
The use of "including" means that the list of information that follows ("advice, recommendations, policy considerations or draft legislation or regulations") is incomplete. These are examples of types of information that would be presumed to reveal the substance of Cabinet deliberations.
Advice, recommendations
"Advice"
"Recommendations"
For the purposes of the Act, "advice, recommendations" refers to the submission of a suggested course of action that will ultimately be accepted or rejected by its recipient during a deliberative process.
Example
- A deputy minister's letter to a minister that includes advice on a particular issue to be discussed at Cabinet.
"Policy considerations" means any information in the record that flags issues or other factors which Cabinet or one of its committees should consider when determining government policy.
Example
Draft legislation or regulations
"Legislation" means Act, as defined in the
Interpretation Act.
"Regulations" means instruments enacted under the authority of an Act or by or under the authority of the Lieutenant Governor in Council (Cabinet), as defined in the
Interpretation Act.
"Draft" means that the Act in question has not yet been introduced in the Legislative Assembly, or the regulation has not been approved by Cabinet, as the case may be.
This applies to entire draft Acts or regulations and to individual sections or phrases that are part of a draft Act or regulation.
This wording covers draft legislation at
all stages of its development - from initial Request for Legislation to the finalized legislation, drafted by Legislative Counsel and awaiting introduction in the Legislative Assembly. After First Reading, the draft legislation is considered a Bill, and is not covered under this exception.
Example
- A Cabinet decision is made to enact legislation that would prohibit smoking in all public places. The Ministry of Attorney General is asked to research the impacts, social benefits and costs of the proposal, and to draft the legislation. All records generated by the ministry in the course of initiating the legislation, including the request for legislation, research, analysis reports, legislative drafts and all directly related documentation, would be covered by this subsection.
Once the final draft has passed First Reading in the Legislative Assembly, it becomes a Bill, and is subject to public scrutiny. The new Bill and any amendments or changes to it that are passed in the Legislative Assembly are a matter of public record. The drafts and associated working materials described above, however, are not matters of public record, and remain covered by this subsection.
This exception to disclosure does not cover background factual material produced or assembled in support of the draft legislation once the final draft legislation has passed First Reading, or a Cabinet decision has been made public not to proceed with it (subsection 12(2)(c)).
"Submitted or prepared for submission" means that the information went before Cabinet or its committees or that it was incorporated into a Cabinet submission or used as the basis for developing a Cabinet submission.
Information that is reasonably expected to be placed before Cabinet or its committees also qualifies as "submitted or prepared for submission", although it may not yet have been placed before Cabinet or its committees.
Example
- A briefing note that could possibly be incorporated into a Cabinet submission at some later date does not qualify as "submitted or prepared for submission".

Interpretation
Note 2 (Section 12(2)):
Subsection (1) does not apply to
This phrase means that any records falling within the following list [paragraphs 12(2)(a) through (c)] are not covered by this exception, and must be released to applicants, unless another of the Act's exceptions applies.
Example
- An attachment to a Cabinet submission may contain names of individuals that are not excepted under section 12, but might be excepted to protect the privacy of an individual under section 22 of the Act.
Interpretation
Note 3 (Section 12(2)(a)):
"That has been in existence for 15 or more years"
The Cabinet confidences exception only applies to records, or portions of records, that have been in existence less than 15 years.
See "Calculation of Time"
Examples
-
If a record was created on June 1,
1985, it would be 15 years old on June 1, 2000.
-
Information relating to a sensitive
issue, contained within a Cabinet submission, marked strictly
confidential, and 15 years and 1 day old, would be released (unless
other exceptions, such as the third party business exception,
applied).
Interpretation
Note 4 (Section 12(2)(b)):
Decision made by the Executive Council or any of its committees on an appeal under an Act
Where Cabinet or a Cabinet committee functions as a final appellate
body under an Act and makes a decision, the decision and any recorded
reasons for the decision are available to the public. The Cabinet
confidences exception does not apply here.
Other portions of the
record covered by this exception (such as advice or recommendations used by
Cabinet to make a decision in this capacity) would not be affected by
paragraph 12(2)(b).
Example
- Pursuant to the
Agricultural Land
Commission Act, a landowner is granted leave to appeal a
decision of the Agricultural Land Commission, which refused his
application to remove his land from the Agricultural Land Reserve.
The Environment and Land Use Committee (a Cabinet committee) hears
the appeal and decides not to overturn the decision of the
Commission. The committee's decision and reasons for decision must
be disclosed, unless another exception applies.
Interpretation
Note 5 (Section 12(2)(c)):
"Purpose"
Background explanations or analysis
"Background"
means explanatory or contributory information or circumstances [OED] which provides background to the Cabinet deliberations. The attachments to a Cabinet submission usually perform this function.
"Explanations"
means to make clear or intelligible with detailed information; to make one's meaning clear [OED].
"Analysis"
means a statement of a detailed examination of the elements or structure of a scenario, issue, problem, or sequence of events.
The phrase
"background explanations or analysis" does not include information that
would reveal the substance of deliberations of Cabinet or its committees,
referred to in subsection 12(1). A summary of the background attachments in
the body of the Cabinet submission which outlines the key implications that
should guide Cabinet decision-making is the substance of deliberations.
Examples
The following information falls within
the definition of "background explanation or analysis":
-
An attachment to a Cabinet
submission that illustrates and analyzes the economic situation
that led up to the purpose of the submission: to decide whether
stumpage fees should be raised in the forest industry.
-
An attachment to a Request for
Legislation that provides background information and analysis of
the approach taken to the legislative issue in other
jurisdictions.
Decision has been made public
If Cabinet or one
of its committees has made a "decision" on an issue or problem, or chosen a
course of conduct that government will follow, and it "has been made
public", the background explanations or analysis do not fall under the
Cabinet confidences exception.
"Made public" means that the decision
has been communicated to the public by a minister or other authorized person
(e.g., communications director).
Examples
-
a formal press conference;
-
a statement by a minister or senior
ministry executive;
-
a statement by a minister during
Question Period in the Legislative Assembly; and
-
a letter from a minister to a
newspaper.
Decision has been implemented
"Implemented" means the point in time when implementation of, or acting upon, the Cabinet decision begins.
Example:
Treasury Board has made a decision to cut spending in a particular program. No public announcement has been made. At the point in time when the spending cut has been communicated to the ministry officials and the ministry begins making the budget cuts to the program, the background explanations or analysis used by Treasury Board to make its decision will not be covered by this exception.
Example
- A decision is implemented in the fall to change taxes in the spring budget, but the tax change is not publicly announced. This information would be excepted from disclosure until the spring under section 17 of the Act.
5 or more years have passed since the decision was made or considered
See "Calculation of Time"

LOCAL PUBLIC BODY CONFIDENCES -
12(3) and 12(4)
SUMMARY
Local public bodies are not bound by this manual. The following Procedure and Interpretation units are suggestions intended to assist local public bodies in interpreting the legislation and its administration.
Subsection 12(3) is intended to prevent the harm to local public bodies that is presumed to occur if the substance of deliberations is revealed before or too soon after the issues were considered or revealed prior to being ready for public review. Matters considered in camera, usually related to land, legal issues, legislation and human resources, are deemed to present potential harm to the local public body, if those discussions were held in camera.
Subsection 12(3) gives the head of a local public body the discretion to refuse to disclose information that would reveal a draft legal instrument (e.g., resolution, by-law), a draft of a private bill or the substance of deliberations of an in camera meeting of its governing body.
Subsection 12(3) operates in conjunction with other Acts or the
Regulation under
paragraph 76(2)(l) of the
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act to provide limited protection for the substance of deliberations of meetings of a local public body's elected officials, or its governing body or a committee of its governing body.
Paragraph 12(3)(b) may only be used to withhold information from an in camera meeting where another Act or a Regulation under this Act authorizes the holding of that meeting in the absence of the public. This interpretation of paragraph 12(3)(b) is consistent with government's stated intention in drafting the in camera provisions of the Act.
Paragraph 12(3)(b) and any Regulation created under paragraph 76(2)(l) governs only what recorded information may be withheld under the local public bodies confidences exception. They do not in any way limit what may be discussed in camera or affect local public bodies right to regulate procedures for their meetings.
Subsection 12(3) does not apply to records that would reveal a subject matter that has been considered in a meeting open to the public, or to records that have been in existence for 15 years or more.

LOCAL PUBLIC BODY CONFIDENCES -
12(3) and 12(4)
PROCEDURE
-
Determine the age of the record. See
Calculation of Time. If the requested record has been in existence for 15 or
more years, this exception does not apply (paragraph 12(4)(b)) and the record
must be released unless another exception applies.
-
Preliminary
Examination
-
Line by Line Review
Determine whether the draft or the subject matter of the deliberations which
would be revealed has been considered in a meeting open to the public. If so,
this exception does not apply and the record must be released, unless another
exception applies [paragraph 12(4)(a)].
-
Exercise of
Discretion
-
Severance

LOCAL PUBLIC BODY CONFIDENCES -
12(3) and 12(4)
INTERPRETATION
Records falling within the
paragraphs 12(4)(a) or (b) are
not covered by this exception, and must
be released to applicants, unless another exception
applies.
Interpretation
Note 6 (Section 12(3)(a)):
Draft of a resolution, bylaw or other legal instrument
"Draft" means that the resolution, bylaw or other legal instrument or bill in question has not yet been finalized for consideration by the local public body.
This applies to entire draft legal instruments or private Bills and to individual sections or phrases that are part of a draft.
Example
- A preliminary version of a
zoning bylaw drafted by the
municipal planning department.
"Resolution" means a formal expression of the opinion or will of an official body or public assembly, adopted by vote. The term is usually employed to denote the adoption of a motion, the subject matter of which would not properly constitute a statute, such as a mere expression of opinion; an alteration of the rules; a vote of thanks or of censure, etc. [Black's].
Example
- A policy analyst for a school
district drafts a resolution. The
analyst makes several revisions to
the resolution before submitting it
to the Board of School Trustees for
consideration. All versions other
than the final version submitted to
the Board may be withheld under this
section. The version that is
submitted to the Board may not be
withheld.
Generally, "bylaw" means a rule or resolution adopted by a corporation to regulate its operations [DCL]. As it applies to local government bodies, "bylaw" means a Regulation made by the council or board and formalized in a document known as a bylaw.
"Other legal instrument by which the local public body acts" means any formal or legal document in writing, other than a resolution or bylaw, which relates to the internal governance of the local public body or with the Regulation of its area of jurisdiction.
Example
Rules established by the Law Society of British Columbia.
- Drafts of resolutions, bylaws or other legal instruments by
which the local public body acts which will govern the conduct or
actions of a local public body may be withheld, unless the
provisions of subsection 4 apply.
Example
- An initial draft of a school
board Regulation regarding
curriculum requirements may be
withheld under this section.
Private Bill
"Private Bill" means a bill relating to matters of particular interest or benefit to an individual or group.
Example
- Vancouver Charter
- Resort Municipality of
Whistler Act

Interpretation
Note 7 (Section 12(3)(b)):
The substance of deliberations
"Substance"
"Deliberation"
means the act of deliberating, the act of
weighing and examining the reasons for and against a contemplated act or course of conduct or a choice of acts or means [Black's].
The following are some of the types of records that are presumed to reveal the
substance of deliberations of a local public body's elected officials or
governing body or a committee of the governing body.
Note that in the following examples,
subsection
12(3) would apply only if the subject of the deliberations is one
of the matters specified as those which may be considered in camera either in
another Act or in a Regulation under the Freedom of Information and
Protection of Privacy Act. [For an alternative interpretation of
subsection 12(3), see the note following the interpretation of the phrase "If an
Act or a Regulation under this Act authorizes the holding of a meeting in the
absence of the public."]
Examples
-
An agenda, minute or other record that documents
the matters addressed by the elected officials, governing body or committee of
the governing body; e.g., minute of a meeting of the Vancouver Police Board
which reveals the substance of discussions of a personnel issue at a recent
board meeting.
-
A letter from
an elected official that relates to the
discussion or consideration of an issue or
problem, or that reflects a decision that
has not yet been made public; e.g., a letter
from the Chair of a school board to the
school trustees summarizing a recent
decision of the Board which has not yet been
made public.
-
A briefing note or submission placed before the
elected officials, governing body or one of its committees.
-
A
briefing note from the City Clerk to
Council concerning a matter that
will be/is being considered by the
council
Meeting of its elected officials
or of its governing body or a committee of its governing body
"Meeting" means an assembly or gathering at which the business of the local public body is considered.
"Elected officials" means those people elected by the constituents of the local public body to conduct the business of the local public body.
"Governing body" means the assembly of persons who are responsible for the administration of the local public body.
"Committee of its governing body" means a group of people designated by the governing body of the local public body who have been designated to consider a particular issue or subject matter. A committee may be composed of elected officials, members of the local public body and/or other persons designated by the governing body.
If an Act or a Regulation under this Act authorizes the holding of a meeting in the absence of the public
"Act" means a statute of British Columbia, and does not include any Regulations, rules or bylaws under a statute.
"Regulation under this Act" means a Regulation under the
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
A public body may withhold a record that reveals the substance of deliberations
at an in camera meeting where there is express authorization in an Act or in a
Regulation under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
that allows that meeting in the absence of the public and that specifies the
matters that may be discussed at the meeting. This interpretation of
paragraph
12(3)(b) is consistent with government's stated intention in drafting the in
camera provisions of the Act.
Information from an in camera meeting may not be withheld under the authority of
an Act that permits meetings to be held in the absence of the public without
specifying the matters that may be discussed, or under the authority of an Act
that merely provides a power to make Regulations, bylaws or rules allowing for
meetings in the absence of the public or regarding the general conduct of
meetings.
The Regulation under
paragraph
76(2)(l) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
provides authority for the application of paragraph 12(3)(b) in cases where a
local public body's governing Act does not do so. It is expected that the in
camera provisions of other Acts governing local public bodies will be reviewed
and amended to specify matters that may be discussed in camera.
Note: An alternative interpretation of
paragraph 12(3)(b) would permit a
local public body to withhold information from an in camera meeting where
another Act authorizes meetings in the absence of the public without
specifically listing matters that may be discussed at such meetings.
Examples
-
The
Police Act explicitly authorizes the
holding of meetings in the absence of the public to discuss specified matters.
The minutes of an in camera meeting of a Police Board to consider a matter
specified in the Police Act may be withheld under paragraph 12(3)(b).
-
The
School Act and the
Municipal Act
authorize the holding of meetings in the absence of the public, but do not
specify the matters that may be considered at those meetings.
-
The
University Act gives the university
board of governors the power "to make rules for the meetings of the board and
its transactions." In this case, the Act does not authorize that meetings be
held in the absence of the public, but merely allows the board to make rules
regarding this matter.
-
Local public bodies governed by the
University
Act, the Municipal Act or the School Act may not withhold
information that would reveal the substance of deliberations of an in camera
meeting under the authority of their own Act. They may, however, use paragraph
12(3)(b) to protect such information if the subject is one of the matters
specified in the Regulation under paragraph 76(2)(l) of the
Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Act. [For an alternative interpretation of section 12(3), see the
note preceding these examples.]
Other exceptions may apply to information in a
record of an in camera meeting.
Absence of the public
The "public" means the public at large, not simply the members of the local public body who are not elected officials, members of the governing body or members of a committee under the governing body.
Example
-
A meeting open to the members of the College of Teachers, but not to the public at large, is a meeting held in the absence of the public.
-
A meeting open to the public, which no members of the public happen to attend, is not a meeting held in the absence of the public.
-
A meeting which may be held in camera under the
School Act, but to which the public is nevertheless invited, is not a meeting held in the absence of the public.
-
A meeting which may be held in camera under the
Local Government Act, but to which certain
members of the public are invited to discuss
sensitive issues that pertain to their property
or other rights, is a meeting held in the
absence of the public.
Interpretation
Note 8 (Section 12(4)):
Has been considered in a meeting open to the public
Where the draft of the resolution, bylaw, other legal instrument or private Bill or the subject matter of the deliberations has been considered during a meeting open to the public,
subsection 12(3) provides that it must be disclosed.
A draft has been "considered" where it has been the subject of discussions by members of the local public body.
A meeting "open to the public" means a meeting from which the local public body has not excluded the public. Where a local public body does not explicitly exclude the public from a meeting, that meeting is presumed to be open to the public.
That has been in existence for 15 or more years
See "Calculation of Time".
Examples
- If a record was created on May
15, 1981, it would be 15 years old
on May 15, 1996.
- The minutes of an in camera
meeting of a municipal council, the
subject matter of which has never
been considered in a meeting open to
the public, and is 15 years and 1
day old, would be released (unless
other exceptions, such as the third
party business exception, applied.)
SECTIONAL INDEX OF
COMMISSIONER'S ORDERS
For orders organized by the Act's section
numbers,
Click here.
|